Report: Silencing Aboriginal women on issues of violence
This article, in response to Wheeler Centre event, Future Voices: Decolonising Australian Media, presented with Our Watch, was originally published on Amy McQuire’s Substack Presence. You can sign up here to read more.
Last week, I watched Future Voices: Decolonising Australia Media, a brilliant conversation between four First Nations women who I admire – Karla McGrady, Chelsea Watego, Bridget Brennan and Sono Leone. This event aimed to interrogate white feminism and the Australian media. The panel was held following a long, hard week in which black Australia mourned the deaths of three young Aboriginal people who lost their lives. One of them was young mother Charlene Warrior in Bute, South Australia, and the other Gordon Copeland in Moree, NSW. Both Charlene and Gordon had been missing for an extended period of time, and in both cases their families and communities had searched for them while media paid them little attention. We also remembered Aboriginal woman JC in Geraldton, who was shot by a police officer last year. The cop in question, who has not been identified, has been charged with her murder, and the trial began last week in the WA Supreme Court. Despite its significance – it is believed to be the first time in over 90 years that a WA cop has been charged with murder ‘during the line of duty’ – JC’s case has not led to national coverage.
In the midst of a suffocating national silence, Aboriginal mob from all across the country paid tribute to the lives of Charlene, Gordon and JC. This was on my mind as I watched the panel, and particularly during one part, where Bridget, who is ABC’s Indigenous affairs editor, spoke of her experiences reporting stories of violence against Aboriginal women. She had written a brilliant report centring the voices of the Tangentyere Women’s Safety Group in Alice Springs. After publishing the piece, one of her colleagues had commended her for the story, and had told her that often Aboriginal women did not want to speak out on issues of violence. Bridget had been shocked by that assessment, because she had said it wasn’t a question of Aboriginal women being voiceless, but that their voices had not been amplified.
…she had said it wasn’t a question of Aboriginal women being voiceless, but that their voices had not been amplified.
In the conversation that followed, Chelsea had made the point that it was not just the failure to amplify black women’s voices, but that there were deliberate attempts to silence them. Aboriginal women are not silent on issues of violence, but in this place, there is an active, deliberate silencing. Last week, Aboriginal women rose up to resist this silencing, particularly in the case of Charlene. There had been very few media reports on her disappearance before she was found and it was not lost on many of us that if it had been a white woman who had disappeared, there would have been more attention, and a greater public outcry.
Just like the colleague’s logic in Bridget’s anecdote, Aboriginal women are often held responsible, or out-right blamed for what is actually a deliberate silencing of our voices, even while we do everything possible to garner attention. There have been several high profile cases of non-Indigenous women who have lost their lives, and these cases spark national displays of mourning, lead to candlelit vigils, and lead news coverage. While this is important, the question that is always asked is – why don’t the deaths of our women garner the same response?
Aboriginal women who are victims of violence are often re-victimised in media representations following their deaths. They are painted in dehumanising terms, and seen as responsible for their own deaths. When attempts are made to ‘humanise’ them, it is always in language that sees ‘human’ as close to whiteness, as most palatable to white Australia. Their resistances to overlapping waves of violence throughout their lives, resistances that may not be recognised as such, do not always fit this criteria, and so these resistances are interpreted as ‘angry’ or ‘violent’ and they are dehumanised again. I’m thinking of this in relation to JC’s case, particularly, where her contact with the criminal justice system has obscured the violence of this very same system.
Aboriginal women who are victims of violence are often re-victimised in media representations following their deaths.
So often, ‘mournable’ deaths, the deaths that lead to displays of empathy, are mournable because women view these experiences as so close to their own. There is a common mantra that accompanies this: ‘It could have been me’, ‘It could have been us’, ‘it could have been any woman’. In many cases of murdered and missing Aboriginal women, it would not have been ‘us’, or ‘me’. The unique experiences of Aboriginal women resisting violence is inconceivable to a public accustomed to viewing us solely as perpetrators, and if we are not perpetrators, then complicit in a ‘silence’. ‘Humanising’ means focusing on the similar, ‘universalising’ our experiences as women, but denying the oppressions that make us vulnerable to these forms of violence – for example, the oppressions that made JC vulnerable to being visible to police on the day she died. In that sense, I feel ‘humanising’ can often be used as a silencing tactic, because it makes our worthiness dependent on our closeness to whiteness, and further obscures the violence that is unrecognised by white Australia because ultimately, it benefits them.
Silencing often works by not only silencing the voices and testimonies of black women, but by replacing the ‘silence’ with a discourse that is most palatable to White Australia. That is why ‘racism’ is only spoken of by blackfellas, who know intimately the realities of racist violence in this colony, and why there are deliberate attempts to make claims that this is not violence, but protocol or procedure.
Silencing often works by not only silencing the voices and testimonies of black women, but by replacing the ‘silence’ with a discourse that is most palatable to White Australia.
By remembering our people who have lost their lives, by making claims of their worthiness as people, and by making visible the violence – not only that which ended their lives, but which they resisted throughout their lives – we resist these active attempts at silencing. We must continue to mourn for them.
Hot Desk Extract: three approaches to mem*ry
Paul Dalla Rosa on An Exciting and Vivid Inner Life
'Nothing connects humans like fiction'
Giving new life to lost objects
How tiny dioramas brought joy to a locked down world